Frequently Asked Questions

Overview

What types of cases does Dr. Jenna Saul specialize in?
Dr Saul provides expert forensic consulting in cases a high conflict custody dynamic exists, where  there are concerns about domestic abuse, coercive control, and child safety.

How can Dr. Jenna Saul help in custody disputes?
Dr Saul provides forensic consultation, expert testimony, work product reviews, and comprehensive assessments, to develop strategies that place child safety and well-being at the forefront in family court.  

What is coercive control in the context of child custody?
In the context of child custody, coercive control  refers to a sustained pattern of psychological, emotional, or financial abuse designed to dominate or isolate a parent, and restrict the autonomy of both the targeted parent and children. Such dynamics can severely compromise child safety and well-being and often influence custody outcomes in family court.

How does Dr. Jenna Saul protect children's best interests?
Dr. Jenna Saul protects children’s best interests through evidence‑driven forensic assessments that use systematic methodology and the latest scientific research. She evaluates risk, patterns of coercive control, and parent–child dynamics to inform clear, court‑ready recommendations that prioritize child safety, stability, and healthy development. When appropriate, she outlines structured, measurable steps to support safe, meaningful parent–child contact.

Can Dr. Jenna Saul assist attorneys in family court cases?
Yes, Dr. Jenna Saul assists attorneys in complex family court cases by providing authoritative expert witness testimony, strategic case consultation, and evidence‑based reviews of other expert reports. Her forensic expertise in coercive control, domestic abuse, and child safety ensures that arguments are scientifically grounded and focused on protecting children’s best interests.

How does working with Dr. Jenna Saul reduce legal costs?
Working with Dr. Jenna Saul helps streamline family court and high‑conflict divorce cases by providing evidence‑driven assessments, clear strategies, and scientifically grounded insights. Her expertise supports attorneys with focused analysis and well‑structured case narratives, allowing the legal team to concentrate on advocacy while ensuring child safety and psychological issues are fully addressed. This collaborative approach strengthens outcomes and promotes efficiency in complex custody, coercive control, and domestic abuse matters.

Where has Dr Jenna Saul provided forensic consulting?

Dr. Jenna Saul has provided forensic consulting and expert testimony in Wisconsin, across the United States, and internationally in Canada and the Bahamas. Her broad experience in diverse jurisdictions ensures that family court cases involving allegations of coercive control, domestic abuse, parental alienation, and child safety are supported with scientifically grounded analysis and consistent methodology.

Does Dr. Jenna Saul have experience with family court assessments and testimony?

Yes. Dr. Jenna Saul has extensive experience conducting evidence‑driven assessments and providing expert testimony in family court, spanning more than 25 years. Her work addresses parent–child contact problems, allegations of parental alienation and enmeshment, domestic abuse, coercive control, child abuse, and high‑conflict custody disputes. By applying systematic methodology and the latest psychological science, she delivers authoritative insights that strengthen case narratives and prioritize child safety and well‑being.

What is the value of a work product review, and how can it help in family court cases?

A work product review is a detailed forensic evaluation of reports, assessments, or testimony prepared by other professionals in a case. Dr. Jenna Saul conducts evidence‑driven reviews to identify strengths, weaknesses, and potential oversights—particularly in matters where concerns about coercive control, domestic abuse, parental alienation, child safety, and high‑conflict divorce have been raised. By applying systematic methodology and the latest psychological science, she ensures that the information presented to the court is accurate, consistent, and aligned with child well‑being. These reviews can highlight when critical issues such as domestic abuse or child protection have been minimized or overlooked, ultimately strengthening case narratives and supporting attorneys in building scientifically credible arguments.

For Parents:

High‑Conflict Custody and Safety


Q: What is a high‑conflict custody case and how is it different from a “difficult divorce”?
A: A high‑conflict custody case is defined less by frequent disagreements and more by persistent, intense, and often one‑sided patterns of hostility, litigation, and boundary‑violating behavior that harm children and distort the legal process. Unlike a typical difficult divorce, high‑conflict cases often involve coercive control, psychological abuse, or entrenched patterns that do not respond to ordinary negotiation or co‑parenting interventions.
Q: How can I tell if one parent has a high‑conflict personality versus both of us just disagreeing?
A: High‑conflict personalities tend to show repeated blame‑shifting, extreme all‑or‑nothing thinking, refusal to accept responsibility, and patterns of escalation even when the other parent attempts to de‑escalate. Evaluation looks at behavior over time—who is primarily driving conflict, who is trying to set healthy boundaries, and how each parent’s actions affect the children’s safety and well‑being.
Q: How do courts view coercive control, stalking, or psychological abuse in custody disputes?
A: Courts are increasingly recognizing that non‑physical abuse—such as coercive control, stalking, threats, and gaslighting—can be as harmful to children as physical violence, particularly when it undermines a safe parent or exposes children to chronic fear. Expert input can help the court understand these patterns, document risk, and craft parenting plans that protect children while minimizing opportunities for continued control.
Q: What can I do to protect my child emotionally during a high‑conflict custody case?
A: Protecting a child emotionally includes maintaining predictable routines, shielding them from adult conflict, and responding calmly and truthfully (but age‑appropriately) to their questions. Therapeutic or forensic consultation can help parents learn developmentally appropriate communication, support children’s coping skills, and create parenting plans that reduce exposure to conflict.
Q: Can parallel parenting or non‑traditional parenting plans help in high‑conflict situations?
A: Yes. When direct co‑parenting is too conflictual or unsafe, parallel parenting and other structured plans with detailed schedules, clear boundaries, and limited direct contact can reduce opportunities for control and reduce stress for children. These plans often rely on written communication tools and clear decision‑making protocols, and may be recommended when traditional co‑parenting is not realistic.


Working With Dr Saul


Q: What types of cases does Dr. Jenna Saul specialize in?
A: Dr Saul provides expert forensic consulting in cases a high conflict custody dynamic exists, where there are concerns about domestic abuse, coercive control, and child safety.
Q: How can Dr. Jenna Saul help in custody disputes?
A: Dr Saul provides forensic consultation, expert testimony, work product reviews, and comprehensive assessments, to develop strategies that place child safety and well-being at the forefront in family court.
Q: How does Dr. Jenna Saul protect children's best interests?
A: Dr. Jenna Saul protects children’s best interests through evidence‑driven forensic assessments that use systematic methodology and the latest scientific research. She evaluates risk, patterns of coercive control, and parent–child dynamics to inform clear, court‑ready recommendations that prioritize child safety, stability, and healthy development. When appropriate, she outlines structured, measurable steps to support safe, meaningful parent–child contact.
Q: How can private custody consulting help me prepare for court or mediation?
A: Private custody consulting helps parents clarify goals, organize documentation, and understand how family courts evaluate “best interests of the child.” Sessions often focus on safety concerns, patterns of behavior, and ways to present information coherently and respectfully so judges, evaluators, and attorneys can clearly see the child’s needs and risks.
Q: What is the difference between individual consultation and group strategy sessions?
A: Individual consultation offers confidential, tailored support focused on your specific case, including evidence organization, communication coaching, and emotional coping skills. Group strategy sessions provide education, structure, and peer support in a guided format, helping participants learn core concepts, ask questions anonymously, and reduce costs while still gaining expert guidance.
Q: How do you help parents organize evidence without becoming overwhelmed?
A: Parents are guided to focus on patterns and relevance rather than volume, grouping texts, emails, recordings, and records around key themes such as safety incidents, boundary violations, and support for the child’s needs. This structured approach reduces anxiety and produces clear, chronological, and developmentally focused materials that are easier for attorneys, evaluators, and judges to understand.
Q: Can you help me communicate with my ex in ways that look reasonable to the court?
A: Yes. Coaching focuses on brief, child‑centered, non‑reactive communication that demonstrates respect for boundaries and supports the child’s relationship with both parents where it is safe to do so. This can reduce conflict, improve how you are perceived by professionals, and create written records that reflect thoughtful, responsible parenting.
Q: How do you support fathers or mothers who feel they are not being heard in family court?
A: Support includes helping parents translate their lived experience into clear, evidence‑based narratives, preparing them for evaluations and testimony, and identifying when expert input is needed to explain coercive control or trauma responses. The goal is to make sure the court can see the underlying dynamics affecting the children, rather than misinterpreting trauma, fear, or protective actions as “mutual conflict.”
Q: What should I expect emotionally from a custody evaluation or interview process?
A: Parents often experience heightened anxiety, grief, anger, and fear during evaluations and court involvement. Preparation can include psychoeducation about the process, skills for emotional regulation during interviews or depositions, and strategies for staying focused on the child’s needs rather than on reactive conflict.
Q: How does working with Dr. Jenna Saul reduce legal costs?
A: Working with Dr. Jenna Saul helps streamline family court and high‑conflict divorce cases by providing evidence‑driven assessments, clear strategies, and scientifically grounded insights. Her expertise supports attorneys with focused analysis and well‑structured case narratives, allowing the legal team to concentrate on advocacy while ensuring child safety and psychological issues are fully addressed. This collaborative approach strengthens outcomes and promotes efficiency in complex custody, coercive control, and domestic abuse matters.

For Attorneys

Expert Support and Case Strategy
Q: Can Dr. Jenna Saul assist attorneys in family court cases?
A: Yes, Dr. Jenna Saul assists attorneys in complex family court cases by providing authoritative expert witness testimony, strategic case consultation, and evidence‑based reviews of other expert reports. Her forensic expertise in coercive control, domestic abuse, and child safety ensures that arguments are scientifically grounded and focused on protecting children’s best interests.
Q: What is the value of a work product review, and how can it help in family court cases?
A: A work product review is a detailed forensic evaluation of reports, assessments, or testimony prepared by other professionals in a case. Dr. Jenna Saul conducts evidence‑driven reviews to identify strengths, weaknesses, and potential oversights—particularly in matters where concerns about coercive control, domestic abuse, parental alienation, child safety, and high‑conflict divorce have been raised. By applying systematic methodology and the latest psychological science, she ensures that the information presented to the court is accurate, consistent, and aligned with child well‑being. These reviews can highlight when critical issues such as domestic abuse or child protection have been minimized or overlooked, ultimately strengthening case narratives and supporting attorneys in building scientifically credible arguments.
Q: What does a forensic child and adolescent psychiatrist do in a custody case?
A: A forensic child and adolescent psychiatrist integrates clinical expertise in child development, trauma, and family systems with legal standards and evidentiary requirements. In custody matters, this can include conducting evaluations, clarifying the impact of alleged abuse or coercive control, assessing risk, and providing expert opinions that assist the court in making child‑focused, safety‑driven decisions.
Q: What is the difference between a treating therapist, custody evaluator, and expert witness?
A: A treating therapist focuses on the child’s or parent’s therapeutic needs and usually does not investigate all sides of a dispute. A custody evaluator conducts a neutral, court‑ordered assessment of the family to make recommendations. An expert witness may be retained to explain specialized topics (such as coercive control or trauma) or to critique existing evaluations; this role emphasizes objectivity, methodology, and clear communication with the court.
Q: When should an attorney involve a custody expert or work‑product reviewer?
A: Attorneys often seek expert involvement when there are complex psychological issues, serious safety concerns, disputed evaluations, or allegations that may be misunderstood without specialized knowledge (such as coercive control, alienation claims, or trauma responses). Early consultation can help shape discovery, guide questions for other experts, and prevent avoidable errors in case theory.
Q: How can a forensic psychiatrist assist with case theory and cross‑examination in custody litigation?
A: A forensic psychiatrist can help counsel develop coherent case themes, identify key data points, and craft targeted questions for direct and cross‑examination of parties, evaluators, and other experts. This support ensures that testimony highlights risk, protective factors, and scientific principles clearly, helping the court see how psychological evidence connects to best‑interest and safety determinations.
Q: How do expert reports influence settlement versus trial in custody disputes?
A: Clear, methodologically sound reports that explain risk, child needs, and recommended structures often encourage settlement because they give both parties and the court a roadmap grounded in evidence. When cases proceed to trial, these same reports provide the foundation for focused testimony and judicial findings that prioritize safety and developmental needs.
Q: What types of cases benefit most from a neutral expert versus a retained expert?
A: Neutral experts, such as court‑appointed evaluators, are often used when the court needs a comprehensive, balanced assessment of the entire family. Retained experts are especially valuable when existing evaluations are disputed, when specialized knowledge about coercive control or trauma is required, or when one side needs help organizing complex psychological evidence into a coherent, scientifically grounded narrative.


About Dr. Saul’s Background and Scope of Practice

Q: Where has Dr Jenna Saul provided forensic consulting?
A: Dr. Jenna Saul has provided forensic consulting and expert testimony in Wisconsin, across the United States, and internationally in Canada and the Bahamas. Her broad experience in diverse jurisdictions ensures that family court cases involving allegations of coercive control, domestic abuse, parental alienation, and child safety are supported with scientifically grounded analysis and consistent methodology.
Q: Does Dr. Jenna Saul have experience with family court assessments and testimony?
A: Yes. Dr. Jenna Saul has extensive experience conducting evidence‑driven assessments and providing expert testimony in family court, spanning more than 25 years. Her work addresses parent–child contact problems, allegations of parental alienation and enmeshment, domestic abuse, coercive control, child abuse, and high‑conflict custody disputes. By applying systematic methodology and the latest psychological science, she delivers authoritative insights that strengthen case narratives and prioritize child safety and well‑being.
Q: What qualifications should a child custody expert or evaluator have?
A: A child custody expert or evaluator should have advanced training in child and adolescent development, family systems, and forensic assessment; experience with high‑conflict custody, coercive control, and domestic abuse; familiarity with professional practice guidelines; and a track record of providing clear, impartial, court‑ready opinions. When domestic abuse is alleged in a custody matter, attorneys need an expert with strong knowledge and a multidisciplinary lens that includes criminology, victimology, law, psychology, child development, interpersonal conflict, and sociology. Forensic expertise in systematic methodology and risk assessment is especially critical when child safety and protective decision‑making are central to the case.

We use cookies to improve your experience and to help us understand how you use our site. Please refer to our cookie notice and privacy statement for more information regarding cookies and other third-party tracking that may be enabled.

Jenna Saul, MD @ChildsBestInterest

© 2022 @ChildsBestInterest

Facebook icon
Instagram icon
Intuit Mailchimp logo